<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LVM snapshot merging avaliable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/</link>
	<description>My grassy patch in a world of walled gardens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:57:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux LVM snapshot commit or revert? - Admins Goodies</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/comment-page-1/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux LVM snapshot commit or revert? - Admins Goodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnor.com/?p=138#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>[...] See this post: http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See this post: <a href="http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to keep or drop LVM snapshot?</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>How to keep or drop LVM snapshot?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnor.com/?p=138#comment-738</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/  September 27, 2010 12:57 pm         Sandra Ok, so `lvremove` accepts the changes in the snapshot. So far so good =)  September 27, 2010 11:18 am         Janne Pikkarainen OK, first of all: the grand old LVM1 supported only read-only snapshots. In that case the modifications were copied to original image after unmounting the snapshot. LVM2 provides support for read-write snapshots, allowing you to do funkier stuff with virtual machine images and stuff like that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/</a>  September 27, 2010 12:57 pm         Sandra Ok, so `lvremove` accepts the changes in the snapshot. So far so good =)  September 27, 2010 11:18 am         Janne Pikkarainen OK, first of all: the grand old LVM1 supported only read-only snapshots. In that case the modifications were copied to original image after unmounting the snapshot. LVM2 provides support for read-write snapshots, allowing you to do funkier stuff with virtual machine images and stuff like that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux LVM snapshot commit or revert? Drija</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux LVM snapshot commit or revert? Drija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnor.com/?p=138#comment-731</guid>
		<description>[...] See this post: http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See this post: <a href="http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LVM kann jetzt endlich mergen... &#8212; [ENC]BladeXP&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>LVM kann jetzt endlich mergen... &#8212; [ENC]BladeXP&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnor.com/?p=138#comment-456</guid>
		<description>[...] ist jetzt möglich da Kernel und LVM-Tools die nötigen Patches erhalten und akzeptiert haben. Man benötigt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ist jetzt möglich da Kernel und LVM-Tools die nötigen Patches erhalten und akzeptiert haben. Man benötigt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Sundaram</title>
		<link>http://www.jonnor.com/2010/02/lvm-snapshot-merging-avaliable/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Sundaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonnor.com/?p=138#comment-413</guid>
		<description>actually the yum plugin can work with lvm snapshots but btrfs is just more efficient</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually the yum plugin can work with lvm snapshots but btrfs is just more efficient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

